The deviance information criterion (DIC) has been widely used for Bayesian model comparison. In particular, a popular metric for comparing stochastic volatility models is the DIC based on the conditional likelihood—obtained by conditioning on the latent variables. However, some recent studies have argued against the use of the conditional DIC on both theoretical and practical grounds. We show via a Monte Carlo study that the conditional DIC tends to favor overfitted models, whereas the DIC calculated using the observed-data likelihood—obtained by integrating out the latent variables—seems to perform well. The main challenge for obtaining the latter DIC for stochastic volatility models is that the observed-data likelihoods are not available in closed-form. To overcome this difficulty, we propose fast algorithms for estimating the observed-data likelihoods for a variety of stochastic volatility models using importance sampling. We demonstrate the methodology with an application involving daily returns on the Standard & Poors (S&P) 500 index.